🔗 Share this article

Donald Trump's national security strategy offers a flawed assessment of the European Union. It claims that open-border policies and so-called "progressive" agendas represent an grave threat to European civilization. Yet, this perspective is based on a fundamental misinterpretation of the situation. The true challenge confronting Europe is not cultural but technological and economic backwardness.

The Stark Growth Gap Between the US and Europe

The data paint a sobering picture. Between 2008 and 2023, US GDP surged by eighty-seven percent, compared to a paltry 13.5% growth for the European Union. During this period, European income per person fell from over three-quarters to just 50% of the US level. Strikingly, even the poorest US state now boasts a higher per capita income than several leading European economies like Italy and France.

Currently, roughly 50% of the global 50 largest technology firms are American, while only four are European.

The Technological Shortfall: The Core Problem

The growing economic gap is driven by superior efficiency gains in the US, fueled by breakthroughs and better use of resources. The landscape of global tech leadership is overwhelmingly US-centric. Over the past five decades, 241 US firms have scaled into companies valued at over $10bn, versus only fourteen in the European continent.

This disparity raises a pressing issue: As the competition for future industries like semiconductors, AI, and quantum computing, where does the EU positioned? Experts widely concede it is essentially a contest between two involving the US and China, with European nations entering at a clear handicap.

Root Causes of Europe's Technological Lag

Several major reasons account for this innovation chasm.

• Financing Ecosystem: The United States has a much more robust and agile system for funding startups. Europe has yet to establish a genuine capital markets union, which caps the growth potential of new firms.
• Regulatory Fragmentation: Complex and divided regulation hamper European business. A US startup can launch a product under one set of laws to access a consumer base of hundreds of millions. The European Union, despite a bigger population size, is split among twenty-seven separate systems, creating significant internal barriers.
• Cultural Attitudes: Views on risk-taking differ sharply. In parts of Europe, business failure was historically viewed with stigma, whereas in the US, it is often considered a valuable lesson.
• Defense Spending: The US benefits from a deeply integrated innovation pipeline linking defense and academia. The continent's chronic underinvestment in military capabilities has weakened its ability in pioneering research.

The Road Ahead: Grounds for Hopefulness

In spite of these hurdles, there are causes for hope. Policymakers are growing more conscious of the existential challenge and have started to advance substantial change. Key reports on EU competitiveness and the internal market point to the need for sweeping changes.

Given appropriate policies and rule changes, these assets might enable much higher levels of business-led breakthroughs.

Europe still possesses significant advantages: skilled human capital, top-tier education systems, and world-class labs. Alongside a large internal market and high savings rates, these elements could unleash a surge of investment and entrepreneurship.

Crucially, even if the EU does not become the leader in developing next-generation technologies, it can still significantly boost economic output by adopting and adapting innovations from elsewhere.

A Critical Juncture

The European Union now stands at a critical crossroads. As the saying goes, economic erosion often happens "slowly, then all at once". So far, the continent's technological decline has been gradual. However, without bold steps to address its deep-seated problems, today's gradual weakening could turn into a sudden and irreversible loss of world influence.